Robust data systems and effective data management in state and territorial health departments are both indispensable and intricate. The intersecting trajectories of public health challenges and technological progress underscore the escalating need for data systems that can adapt and evolve. Yet, health departments regularly confront significant hurdles in this work, including shortages of specialized IT personnel, outdated systems, and complexities in data utilization.
Confronting these challenges requires an understanding that no state or territorial health department is isolated in its struggle. Colleagues’ shared experiences in other jurisdictions, or even other sectors, can offer enlightening guidance. These collective narratives illuminate the common obstacles, illustrate successful strategies, and, most importantly, ignite innovative solutions. Data systems management and modernization should not be perceived merely as a technological overhaul but as a comprehensive transformation that includes workforce training, infrastructure improvements, and procedural refinements for streamlined data processes.
By exchanging experiences and fostering mutual learning, state and territorial health departments can change problems into opportunities for advancement. This collaborative approach ensures their data systems and management practices stay responsive, robust, and well-equipped to tackle the fluid realities of public health emergencies.
IT staff are undeniably critical to effectively managing data systems, particularly in the face of complex public health emergencies. However, challenges related to IT staffing often pose significant hurdles in optimizing and modernizing these systems. These hurdles can range from insufficient knowledge and skills in IT and informatics to competition with tech companies for talent to insufficient understanding of public health’s unique needs. Identifying these factors is crucial to addressing them, ultimately leading to an enhanced public health informatics infrastructure that can efficiently manage and mitigate public health crises.
Common contributing factors to these challenges include:
signal_wifi_statusbar_not_connected
Insufficient IT-related knowledge, skills, and abilities within health departments.
data_exploration
Limited informatics knowledge, skills, and abilities among current IT staff.
event_busy
IT contractors' limited availability to address health departments' comprehensive needs.
medical_information
IT contractors' lack of nuanced understanding of public health's specific needs and demands.
group_add
Difficulty recruiting and retaining IT talent, as compensation packages for in-house IT talent often fall short of being competitive.
person_check
Competition for qualified IT professionals thanks to the burgeoning tech sector, particularly regarding tech companies entering the health/public health space.
This section highlights a successful and innovative solution your peers implemented to address challenges with IT staff. This story presents the factors that catalyzed the innovation, the existing policies or funding mechanisms that facilitated action, the potential barriers the agency faced, the collaborations and partnerships the agency leveraged, and tips for implementing and/or scaling the solution.
Improving Disease Surveillance: Adopting Electronic Laboratory Reporting
Introduction
It’s impossible to overstate how critical timely and accurate data is to public health. It forms the lifeblood of any health response mechanism, shaping how we understand, react to, and ultimately control a wide spectrum of health threats. As we grapple with an increasingly interconnected world, one where local disease events can escalate to global crises, the need for efficient disease surveillance has never been more pressing. Public health laboratories serve as the front line in this landscape. Beyond just producing data, they create valuable insights that can help decipher complex health patterns, predict emerging threats, and tailor effective interventions.
Within this context, the Electronic Laboratory Reporting (ELR) project has emerged as a transformative initiative. This modernized approach to data exchange enables laboratories within CDC’s Laboratory Response Network to efficiently relay biological and chemical threat results to CDC. By integrating Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) with ELR, labs can not only streamline their data management processes, but also catalyze wider impacts across the public health system.
The shift to ELR has been pivotal in improving the efficiency and quality of public health surveillance. Labs can now relay their results directly to CDC using the Health Level Seven infrastructure. Despite this technological leap, the transition encountered some challenges, as in-house IT resources were often limited, delaying the adoption process. To combat these obstacles, CDC provided funding to bolster IT staff capacity and facilitate swift implementation. Furthermore, the Association of Public Health Laboratories received funds to assist labs with the transition to ELR, and labs could additionally apply for funds from CDC’s Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Prevention and Control of Emerging Infectious Diseases program (ELC).
Funding and Support
CDC made funding for ELR implementation available through ELC's annual funding opportunity. These funds have been crucial in resolving technical issues, ensuring smooth LIMS integration, and fostering in-house staff programming.
Challenges and Solutions
Implementing a comprehensive initiative like ELR brought its own set of challenges:
- Limited IT resources: The scarcity of in-house IT staff often slowed the adoption process. However, directed funding has helped support IT staff, accelerating the transition.
- Limited LIMS readiness: Technical assistance provided support to those labs less prepared for LIMS integration.
Collaborations and Partnerships
The success of the ELR project can be largely attributed to the collective efforts of lab staff, LIMS vendors, the ELR Health Level Seven team, and internal staff programmers. Their combined expertise and commitment have been crucial to surmounting challenges and ensuring a smooth implementation.
Tips for Implementing and Scaling
When transitioning to the ELR program, consider these recommendations:
- Secure adequate Funding: Securing funds to support IT staff and resolve technical issues can expedite the ELR implementation process.
- Leverage technical assistance: Make use of available technical assistance to ease the process of LIMS integration.
- Foster collaboration: Close collaboration between lab staff, LIMS vendors, and internal staff programmers is vital to overcoming challenges and facilitating successful implementation.
- Adopt incrementally: Consider adopting ELR in phases to allow staff to resolve issues and adjust to new processes.
APPLYING THIS KNOWLEDGE TO INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Adopting ELR could apply to and benefit infectious disease practice and policy in the following ways:
- Timely disease surveillance: By enabling health departments to quickly and efficiently report laboratory results to CDC, ELR helps track infectious disease patterns in real time. This facilitates early detection of disease outbreaks and swift public health responses.
- Accurate data reporting: ELR reduces the chances of human error in data transcription by automating the data exchange process, ensuring the reliability of the reported infectious disease data.
- Optimized resources: By streamlining data reporting processes, ELR allows health care professionals to focus more on patient care and other critical tasks and less time on manual data entry.
- Broad-spectrum surveillance: ELR isn't limited to specific infectious diseases. It can handle data related to various biological and chemical threat results, enhancing the breadth of disease surveillance.
- Scalable solution: Through the use of Health Level Seven infrastructure, ELR is scalable and can handle increasing data loads as the laboratory's operations expand, ensuring its suitability for large-scale infectious disease surveillance.
- Policy formulation: The accurate and timely data provided by ELR can be invaluable for policymakers in formulating informed public health policies and strategies.
- Data integration: ELR's compatibility with LIMS means it can be integrated into existing workflows with minimal disruption, facilitating a smoother transition.
- Increased collaboration: Successfully implementing ELR necessitates collaboration between different stakeholders, fostering a more cooperative approach to infectious disease surveillance.
This section encompasses a collection of pertinent tools and resources curated from ASTHO's Public Health Innovations Catalog and various other sources to help you navigate and comprehend the intricacies of this subject area. Garner insights and experiences from your peers, enabling you to start building solutions tailored to your health department.
Feeling inspired to address the unique challenges facing your department? With just one click, you can better understand your department's specific gaps and craft a persuasive action plan to present to your leadership and partners.
or explore the other focus areas:
Email the preparedness team with questions or comments.