Tobacco Free Press

                                                                                                                   

 


September/October 2002

 

Note:  This publication has been individually transmitted to state tobacco program managers, ASTHO affiliates, and other tobacco prevention professionals.  You are encouraged to forward all or part of this publication to STATE HEALTH OFFICIALS, COALITION MEMBERS, and OTHER PARTNERS. The Tobacco Free Press is produced by ASTHO under Cooperative Agreement N.U50/CCU306138-07 with the CDC Office on Smoking and Health. _____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

CONTENTS:

·         SECONDHAND SMOKE

·         YOUTH PREVENTION

·         CESSATION

·         OTHER NEWS

·         SAVE THE DATE

·         RESOURCES

·         CONTACT THE EDITOR

 

 


SECONDHAND SMOKE

b
Colorado

On August 20, 2002, Louisville City Council unanimously passed one of the strictest smoking bans in Colorado.  Smoking is prohibited in taverns and indoor and outdoor areas of restaurants.  The ordinance took effect on October 8, 2002.  Violators will be fined $300.

 

To view the ordinance, go the Louisville City Council website at http://www.ci.louisville.co.us/Announcements/smokingord.html. 

 

For more information, contact Kimberly Hills, Boulder County Health Department, at KHILLS@co.boulder.co.us. 

 
Delaware

Delaware has conducted numerous activities in preparation for the amended Clean Indoor Air Act, which goes into effect on November 27, 2002.  The law bans smoking in most indoor public places and workplaces, including bars and casinos. The Division of Public Health (DPH) held two public hearings regarding the regulation. Several bar owners attended and were concerned with enforcement.  DPH is charged with enforcement of the law in public places and the Department of Labor is responsible for enforcement in the workplace.  DPH is in the process of establishing a toll free telephone number to report violations of the law.  Informational sessions for employers and businesses affected by the law were held throughout the state in October 2002.  DPH also sent an advance mailer to businesses informing them of the upcoming law and provided a reply card asking for their input on materials they would need to help them comply with the law.  So far, there have been over 500 responses.  DPH is developing a training kit to provide to businesses.  This kit will contain a copy of the law, a decal indicating smoking is not permitted by law, a brochure explaining the law, and tabletop tents. The kit will be mailed to all businesses and will be provided at the informational sessions.  Television commercials and radio spots informing the public of the law have also been developed to air shortly before and after the law goes into effect.

 

For more information, contact Lisa McKenzie, Delaware Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, 302-744-4544.

 
Hawaii

Maui became the second county in Hawaii to ban smoking in public places.  The Maui County Council voted  unanimously for the clean indoor air ordinance, which includes outdoor seating of restaurants.  It exempts bars that derive one-third of revenue from food sales.  The ordinance becomes effectives January 1, 2003.  Oahu’s ban went into effect July 1, 2002.  Currently, the Kaua'i County Council is considering a clean indoor air ordinance.

 

Massachusetts

The public health departments of Boston and Cambridge met in Fall 2001 to discuss moving forward with comprehensive, local secondhand measures that improve current health regulations and city ordinances.  This led to the creation of "Clean Air Works,” in which 16 greater Boston municipalities have pledged to work toward smokefree worksites for all worksites, including restaurants and bars that have one or more employees.  A similar group of 11 municipalities north of Boston was created.  Together, the 27 cities and towns represent over 1.5 million Massachusetts residents, about 23 percent of the Commonwealth's population.

 

Recent policy changes from Clean Air Works include the passage of smokefree worksite ordinances in Peabody, Beverly, Norfolk and Wrentham.  In addition, Boston Mayor Thomas Menino pledged his support for a stricter smokefree restaurant ordinance during a September 24, 2002 press conference.  The Boston Public Health Commission held a public hearing in mid-October 2002.

 

In other areas of Massachusetts, all bars and restaurants are smokefree in Provincetown as of October 1, 2002.  A restaurant-backed proposal to weaken a 100% smokefree restaurant regulation was defeated during an Easton town meeting.

 

For more information, contact D.J. Wilson, Massachusetts Municipal Association, D.J._Wilson@mma.org.

 
Montana

On August 20, 2002, the Bozeman City Commission unanimously voted to ban smoking in public places, including restaurants.  The ban excludes bars and casinos.  The Commission voted against putting the ordinance to public vote via ballot, whereby the measure would have included banning smoking in all public places including bars and casinos. 

 

Nebraska

“Great Food. Killer Atmosphere” - With those words, tobacco free coalitions in Cass, Douglas, Lancaster, and Sarpy Counties in Nebraska (which include the cities of Lincoln and Omaha) are targeting secondhand smoke in restaurants.  The attention-getting slogan appears on billboards, bus placards, and newspaper advertisements, as well as radio and television ads.  The campaigns were launched in August 2002 by the Tobacco Free Lincoln Coalition and the Tri-County Media Committee, and have resulted in many earned media opportunities.  Ads encourage the public to contact the coalitions for a smoke-free dining guide.

 

 For more information, contact Cindy Wostrel, Health Education Inc., at 402-477-5220 or cwostrel@healtheducation.org, or Kathy Burson at PRIDE-Omaha at 402-397-3309 or at kburson@pride.org.

 

Nevada

Both Washoe and Clark Counties will have two advisory questions regarding secondhand smoke on the November 2002 ballot.  One questions asks whether preemption should be reversed, giving the board of health authority to pass regulations to protect citizens from secondhand smoke.  The second advisory question asks whether state law should prohibit secondhand smoke in places frequented by children.  Nevada is a preemption state.  The questions were legally challenged by gambling and retail associations in Clark County. However, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the questions would stay on the ballot, as they "did not warrant an intervention at this point". 

 

New Mexico

On October 7, 2002, the Las Cruces City Council expanded the city's smoking ordinance to include bars, private clubs and public parks. The original ordinance passed in 1997 included a ban on smoking in all city-owned buildings, restaurants, and other public buildings.  The newly passed ordinance is more expansive and prohibits smoking within a 50-foot radius of those places as well. 

 

New York

The Dutchess County Legislature passed a smoking ban in most public places including restaurants, bowling alleys, bingo halls and workplaces. Free-standing bars and taverns, which generate 60 percent or more of their gross income from alcohol sales, are exempt.  County Executive William Steinhaus let the bill become law without his signature. The law takes effect on January 1, 2003.  In 1999, the Dutchess County Board of Health passed a smoking ban in nearly all public places.  A federal court overturned the ban, stating that only the County Legislature, and not the Board of Health, had the authority to pass such an act.

 

To view the ordinance, go to http://www.dutchessny.gov/smokingregulation.htm. 

 

On October 7, 2002, the Nassau County Legislature passed the strictest clean indoor ordinance in New York state, banning smoking in all workplaces including restaurants, outdoor seating of restaurants, bars and bingo halls.  The law takes effect March 1, 2003, with an exception for bingo halls, which have until January 1, 2004 to comply.  New York City, Suffolk and Westchester counties are also working on smoking bans in public places as well.

Ohio

The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that the Toledo-Lucas County Board of Health clean indoor air regulation was unconstitutional.  The court stated that the Board of Health did not have the authority to make health regulations regarding tobacco use, as Ohio Revised Code did not specifically give them that authority.  In response, Ohio Governor Bob Taft sent a letter to the Director of Health encouraging the Department of Health to send letters to all local elected officials on the dangers of secondhand smoke and to urge them to continue to pass clean indoor air ordinances.

 

The Toledo-Lucas County Board of Health passed a ban on smoking in public places including restaurants, bars, bowling alleys, bingo halls and hotels at the end of May 2001. It was the first county in the state to entirely ban smoking in restaurants and bars. The regulation was scheduled to go into effect on July 8, 2001, but was stalled after a group of 27 plantiffs contended that the Board did not have the authority to enforce the regulation.

 

To read the decision, go to http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/documents/0/2002/2002-ohio-4172.doc.

 

Oklahoma

 Emergency State Board of Health rules to limit smoking in most public places and workplaces remain on hold until a temporary injunction is reversed or lifted. On September 12, 2002, the State Supreme Court ruled on one of two measures appealed by the Oklahoma State Department of Health, deciding the case would remain in the state district court where it was filed rather than be moved to the Oklahoma City district where the agency is headquartered. The other issue still before the higher court is an appeal of the district judge's decision to impose the temporary injunction against enforcement of the rules.

 

Many Oklahoma restaurants and other places went smokefree soon after Governor Frank Keating signed the emergency rules on June 26, 2002. Some switched back to their previous smoking policies when the temporary injunction was imposed on July 23, 2002. Two Sapulpa restaurants, with strong public backing from the Oklahoma Restaurant Association, filed the lawsuit against the Board of Health that led to the injunction.

 

To view the clean indoor air rules adopted by the Oklahoma Board of Health, go to http://www.breatheeasyok.com

 

For more information, contact Bob Miner, OSDH Tobacco Use Prevention Service, 405-271-3619 or bobm@health.state.ok.us.

 

Wyoming

The Substance Abuse Division, Wyoming Department of Health, continues a commitment to reduce prevalence and consumption of tobacco use by adult and young people among all populations.  The community-based efforts are directed at social and environmental changes.  One example of a voluntary policy change involves Kennecott Energy, a company that responded to their employees' concerns about increases in health care costs by eliminating all indoor smoking in all company buildings, vehicles or leased property as of April 1, 2002. They are offering cessation services to their employees as part of their policy. With positive results company -wide, other North America branches are following suit and establishing similar policies. Per employee request, Kennecott Energy is revisiting the policy to make it more comprehensive by including spit tobacco.

 

For more information, contact Janell Uhler at 307-685-3027.

 

 

YOUTH PREVENTION

D

California

In September 2002, California Governor Gray Davis signed a bill into law that prohibits smoking and tobacco-related littering within 25 feet of playgrounds/tot lots.  The fine for violations is $250. This is an amended version of a bill Governor Davis signed last year that added Section 104495 to the Health and Safety Code, and established the first statewide law banning smoking in playgrounds.  However, the initial legislation restricted smoking only within the boundaries of the playground/tot lot and established the fine for violators at $100.  The expanded smoke-free playgrounds/tot lots law will go into effect on January 1, 2003.

 

For more information, contact Joanne Wellman-Benson, RDH, MPH, Program Consultant, Local Programs Unit, Tobacco Control Section, at 916- 445-3737 or jwellman@dhs.ca.gov.

 

Indiana

Smokefree Indiana is focusing on tobacco control among young adults, ages 18 to 24, by funding student-led coalitions at 13 colleges and universities throughout the state of Indiana this year.  Each participating college/university coalition is working to identify and address the aspects of tobacco control, which may be unique to their campuses.  Representatives from each of the funded schools attended a two-day training seminar in Indianapolis on October 4 and 5, 2002.  Peter Debenedittis, Ph.D. presented media literacy training and Joe Abhold, Ph.D. shared success stories from his work in tobacco control at the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh.

 

For more information, contact Robyn Eley, Media Director, Smokefree Indiana, at 317-241-6383 or reley@smokefreeindiana.org.

 

 

Minnesota

The Minnesota Department of Health released promising results from the Minnesota Youth Tobacco Survey.  Results show that tobacco use among middle school and high school students dropped by 11 percent between 2000 and 2002.   The decrease in cigarette smoking for middle-school students dropped 21 percent. 

 

To view the survey, go to http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/chs/data/tobacco.htm.

 

 

Nebraska

On October 8, 2002, the Omaha City Council unanimously passed a youth access ordinance to ban self-service displays and put tobacco products behind the counter. Retailers will be fined $200 for the first violation and $500 for subsequent violations.  The new law goes into effect February 1, 2003.  What made the passage of this ordinance unique was that it was spearheaded by teens.  Reducing Access Getting Even (RAGE) is a teen task force representing several counties within eastern Nebraska.  RAGE is sponsored by the statewide Tobacco Free Nebraska Program and has been organizing since 2000 to fight the tobacco industry. 

 

For more information on RAGE, contact the Region 6 Prevention Center at 402-546-1192.

 

 

 

 CESSATION

GG

Pregnant Smokers

The National Partnership to Help Pregnant Smokers Quit is a coalition of diverse organizations that have joined forces to improve the health of this and future generations by increasing the number of pregnant smokers who quit smoking.  Through a nationwide effort to reach women, providers and communities, the National Partnership hopes to ensure that all pregnant women in the Unites States are screened for tobacco use, and receive best-practice cessation counseling as part of their prenatal care.

 

Recent Partnership efforts have included launching a television public service announcement (PSA) that directs pregnant smokers to a toll-free quitline, which provides free cessation counseling.  The PSA features empowering role models: real women who successfully quit smoking while pregnant, and provides the number of the Great Start Quitline, 1-866-66-START.  Callers can also request additional free quit smoking materials.  Sponsored by the American Legacy Foundation and managed by the American Cancer Society, both National Partnership members, the Quitline is available 24 hours a day.  Since its release in mid-September, the PSA has aired nearly 11,000 times on broadcast or cable outlets.

 

In addition, the Partnership recently developed and released a pre-printed article through the North American Precis Syndicate (NAPS).  The article is a testimonial from Stephanie Conner, a former smoker who quit while pregnant.  In the early stages of her second pregnancy, Conner enrolled in a cessation counseling program, which she said was effective in helping her to quit successfully.  Since its release in late August 2002, the article has generated 176 newspaper articles in 13 different states with an estimated readership of over 3.5 million.

 

For more information on the Partnership and its activities, contact Cathy Melvin at 919-966-8072 or Kay Kahler Vose at 202-973-2958.

 

Minnesota

Starting in September 2002, the Minnesota Tobacco Helpline began offering free nicotine replace therapy (NRT) for callers who are uninsured or do not have coverage for treatment benefits through their health plan.  Callers must enroll in the Helpline’s counseling program “Free and Clear,” and must meet other health and age requirements. The Helpline also extended its hours of operation. 

 

For more information, go to http://www.mpaat.org.  

 

Utah

The Utah Department of Health’s Tobacco Prevention and Control Program launched a cessation media campaign entitled “I Did It!” in which 24 people share their story about quitting tobacco.  Their stories range from quit periods of 3 months to 37 years and their experiences range from those who quit cold turkey, used medication or the patch, and those who quit through smoking cessation classes and the Utah Tobacco Quit Line.   The campaign includes radio, TV, billboards, and posters, and a unique web site. People can share their quitting experiences at http://www.ididit.tv.  

 

In the past year, 13,000 Utahns called the Quit Line, 3,580 of whom used Quit Line referral or quit services. Twenty-six percent of adults that called the Quit Line reported quitting and 30 percent teens that called reported quitting.

 

For more information, contact Lena Dibble, Tobacco Control Program, at 801-538-6917.

 

Washington

According to the Washington State Department of Health, adult smoking rates dropped by 8 percent from 1999 to June 2002.  The decline in smoking means that there were 83,200 fewer smokers, 28,000 people were spared early deaths, and the state would save $134 million in future medical costs. The results are from two telephone surveys of adult smokers and are the first to be released by the state, which began its anti-tobacco program two years ago.  

 

For more information, contact Susan Zemek, WA Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, at 360-236-3634  or go to http://www.doh.wa.gov/Tobacco/. 

 

 

OTHER NEWS

KT

Excise Tax

Cigarette excise taxes will appear on the November 2020 ballot in Arizona. Proposition 303 would increase the cigarette excise tax by $0.60, to total $1.18.  Generated funds would be dedicated to healthcare for working and uninsured families, emergency room and trauma care and disease prevention programs along with supporting scientific research in Arizona universities on heart disease, lung disease, cancer and stroke. Prop. 303 also protects the statewide tobacco prevention program from further budget cuts and ensures its existence into the future.  For more information, go to the Prop 303 website at http://www.azforahealthyfuture.org. 

 

A Missouri county judge ruled on September 23, 2002 that a ballot initiative to increase the tobacco excise tax can be on the November 2002 Missouri ballot.  The judge overturned a decision from Secretary of State Matt Blunt's office, which disqualified the ballot measures in August 2002, claiming supporters had not gathered enough signatures to place the proposals before voters.

 

Sixty-four percent of Oregon voters supported Measure 20 in a special election on September 17, 2002.  Measure 20 increases the cigarette excise tax from $0.68 to $1.28.  Measure 20 was placed on the ballot after Governor John Kitzhaber vetoed the legislation, calling for a permanent tax.  The legislation contains a sunset clause, in which the tax reverts to $0.68 in 2009.

 

Sixty-seven percent of Virginia voters support a $0.60 increase in the cigarette excise tax to reduce youth smoking and reduce the state budget deficit. Virginia has the lowest cigarette excise tax in the country at $0.025.  The tax has not changed since 1966.  The survey was conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research.

 

Securitization

South Dakota Governor Bill Janklow securitized all future tobacco settlement payments on August 26, 2002.  The state will receive a one-lump sum payment, and funds will be deposited in the state Education Enhancement Trust Fund. Other states and territories that have securitized tobacco settlement payments are Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, the District of Columbia, Iowa, Louisiana, Missouri, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Wisconsin, Puerto Rico, Guam and the Virgin Islands.

 

State Conferences

Over 200 members of 44 state funded coalitions attended the 2002 Fall Conference on Tobacco in South Dakota October 7-8 in Sioux Falls.  The South Dakota Department of Health sponsored the event to arm local tobacco control coalitions with the information they need to be successful back in their own communities.  Experienced conference participants also had the opportunity to share the successes and challenges they have faced with coalitions that are just getting started.

 

For more information, contact Angela Campell, Media Coordinator, South Dakota Tobacco Control Program, at Angela.Campbell@state.sd.us. 

 

Framework Convention

The fifth round of negotiations on the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the international tobacco control treaty proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), took place October 14-25, 2002, in Geneva, Switzerland.  The goal is to complete the treaty by May 2003. 

 

For more information, go to the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids website at http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/campaign/global/framework/. 

 

 

SAVE THE DATE

d

·         Interagency Committee on Smoking and Health (ICSH) Cessation Subcommittee Regional Meetings

      October 24, 2002; Washington, DC

      November 14, 2002;  Denver, CO

December 3, 2002;  Chicago, IL.  The ICSH Cessation Subcommittee is convening three regional meetings to solicit input from key audiences who must work in a coordinated manner to successfully promote tobacco use cessation.  The meetings are open to the public.  If your state health department is interesting in speaking at the meeting, contact Jessica Porras by phone 202-205-8500 or email at jporras@cdc.gov.  If you are unable to attend the meetings, but would like to submit comments, fax or email your comments before December 20, 2002. 

 

For more information, go to http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/ICSH/index.htm

 

·         Mayo Clinic Nicotine Dependence Seminar:  Counselor Training and Program Development

November 3-6, 2002; Rochester, MN.  The seminar includes nicotine dependence counselor training and instructions on program development, with speakers drawn from research and clinical staff, Mayo support services, and internationally known experts in the field.

 

For more information, go to http://www.mayoclinic.org/ndc-rst. 

 

·         American Public Health Association (APHA) 130th Annual Meeting

November 9-13, 2002; Philadelphia, PA.   This annual conference features a specific tobacco control track. This year’s theme is “Putting the Public Back into Public Health.” 

 

For more  information, go to http://www.apha.org/meetings/. 

 

 

 

·         2002 National Tobacco Control Conference

November 19-21, 2002; San Francisco, CA.  This conference, sponsored by many different organizations, will present the latest evidence on effective strategies in tobacco control and will include breakout sessions on a variety of areas such as comprehensive tobacco control programs, evaluation and surveillance, cessation, eliminating disparities, public policy, media, and youth prevention. 

 

For more information, go to http://www.tobaccocontrolconference.org.

 

·       Smoking out the Snake: Exposing and Countering Tobacco Industry Sponsorship

May 29-30, 2003; Universal City, CA.  Planned by the California Tobacco Control Section and many other partners, this conference will expose the motives of the industry and whom they target.  Topics of discussion will include tools and techniques to counter sponsorship, local and state legislation, legal action, information on special populations such as ethnic groups, youth, college age, LGBT and other priority populations, and more. 

 

For more information, call 1-800-858-7743.

 

 

RESOURCES

FFor Y

State Results

·         The Utah Department of Health, Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, released its annual report "Real People, Real Savings, Real Results" on tobacco prevention activities funded through the State Tobacco Settlement Account.  Program results include 13,000 calls into the statewide Quit Line, with cessation rates ranging from 25 percent to 30 percent.  20,000 students in grades 5-8 participated in evidence-based tobacco prevention curricula.  Ninety percent of adults and 94 percent of youth recall seeing anti-tobacco ads on television.

 

For more information on the Utah Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, go to http://www.tobaccofreeutah.org/.  To read the report, go to http://health.utah.gov/pio/nr/2002/0917-TobaccoFinalLegRep.pdf.

 

 

Youth Prevention

·         The 2002 National Youth Tobacco Survey found an overall 17.9 percent drop in current smoking rates among school students, when compared with 2000 data.  There was a 21.7 percent decline in smoking prevalence among high school girls and a 14 percent decline among high school boys.  Increased exposure to the American Legacy Foundation’s truth television ad campaign was associated with lower prevalence rates.  There was a 29 percent decrease in prevalence rates among high school students with high exposure to the campaign's television commercials.  Those students with low exposure to the ads showed a 12 percent decline in smoking rates.  The survey was conducted by the American Legacy Foundation, in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 

For more information, go to http://pressroom.americanlegacy.org/pressReleases/54idAlUhdNWJG6TzYH47XE/view. 

 

·         Researchers at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, the Harvard Medical School, and the University of London found that adolescent smokers become addicted to nicotine much faster and while smoking far fewer cigarettes than previously thought. Half of the adolescent smokers that displayed nicotine addiction symptoms, experienced those symptoms within two months of when they started to smoke occasionally (at least once a month).  Girls displayed addiction symptoms sooner than boys.  The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute and appeared in the September 2002 issue of Tobacco Control. 

 

For more information and to view the study, go to the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids website at http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/Script/DisplayPressRelease.php3?Display=533. 

 

·         A report on global tobacco use found that 14 percent of 13 to 15-year-old students around the world currently smoke cigarettes.  The report summarizes findings from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) and was produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Canadian Public Health Association (CPHA), and the National Cancer Institute (NCI).  Results show that exposure to secondhand smoke was extremely high in all countries. Cigarette smoking among students in the United States was 17.7 percent, which was above the global median of 13.9 percent.  In addition, 83 percent of children were not refused purchase of cigarettes because of their age.

 

For more information on global tobacco prevention and to view the report, go to http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/global/GYTS/speeches&pr/youth_tobaccoPR.htm. 

 

·         A study, "Usual Sources of Cigarettes for Middle and High School Students-Texas, 1998-1999 shows that theft of cigarettes by Texas middle school students increased from 8.3 percent in 1998 to 12.3 percent in 1999.  The percentage of middle school students who reported that they would get their cigarettes form other non-commercial sources rose from 16.6 percent in 1998 to 23.3 percent in 1999.  However, the illegal sale of cigarettes to minors however, is becoming less common.  In Texas, the illegal sale rate to minors decreased from 24 percent in 1998 to 13 percent in 1999.

 

The study was conducted by the Texas Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and featured in the October 11, 2002 issue of CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

 

For more information, go to http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/research_data/survey/mmwr5140_intro.htm. 

 

Cessation

·         A study in the October 3, 2002 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine on the California Helpline, a tobacco cessation telephone quitline, found that the counseling protocol doubled quit rates.

 

To view the article, go to http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/347/14/1087. 

 

·         A study in the September 11, 2002 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association found that nicotine replacement theory (NRT) was not effective in increasing long-term successful cessation in California smokers, since becoming available over the counter in August 1996.  The study found that between 1992 and 1999, cessation attempts among California smokers increased 61.4 percent, and NRT use among quitters increased 50.5 percent.  However, a long-term cessation advantage was only observed before NRT became widely available over-the-counter.  Some tobacco control advocates have pointed out that smokers in the study did not use the products correctly, and have called for greater education and access to treatment.  In addition, the majority of smokers in the study did not receive counseling, which is found to be effective.

 

To view the abstract, go to http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v288n10/abs/joc11973.html. 

 

 

 

 

 

Secondhand Smoke

·         A study published in the September 2002 issue of Tobacco Control found that non-smokers have a 47 percent higher chance of developing acute heart disease if they were occasionally or regularly exposed to secondhand smoke.  Exposure to secondhand smoke at work was associated with a greater risk of developing acute heart disease than exposure to smoke at home.

 

To view the full study, you must have a subscription to Tobacco Control.  To view the abstract, go to http://tc.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/3/220. 

 

Policy

·        The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids launched an online campaign, www.KidsBeforeProfits.org, to raise tobacco prevention issues with candidates for public office and urge them to make tobacco prevention a priority. This is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) activity and does not support, oppose, or endorse any candidate for elected office.  In addition, advocates can link to a Spanish version at http://www.KidsBeforeProfits.org/Span.

 

·         The American Lung Association released a report on securitization and why it is poor public policy.  In addition, the report presents case stories and a map showing which states securitized settlement payments, where securitization is being currently considered, and where it has been defeated. 

 

To view the report, go to http://www.lungusa.org/press/tobacco/download/securitization.pdf

 

Prevalence

·         The State Prenatal Smoking Databook 1999 published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides both national and state data on smoking prevalence among pregnant women.  The databook also contains morbidity and mortality data on SIDS deaths and low birth weights, and also information concerning state policies and programs.

 

To view the databook, go to the Smokefree Families website at http://www.smokefreefamilies.org/pdffiles/CDCPrenatalSmoking.pdf.  

 

·         The American Lung Association released, “Trends in Lung Cancer Morbidity and Mortality,” which depicts prevalence, incidence, hospitalization and mortality data for lung disease and cigarette smoking. Data are gathered from national surveys, databases and reports and are examined by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and, in some cases, educational attainment and economic impact.

 

To view the report, go to http://www.lungusa.org/data/index.html. 

 

·         Evaluation

The California Department of Health Services, Tobacco Control Section (CDHS/TCS) published a chapter on promoting local program evaluation in Responding to Sponsors and Stakeholders in Complex Evaluation Environments: New Directions for Evaluation #95, Rakesh Mohan, David J. Bernstein, Maria D. Whitsett (Eds).  The monograph explores how evaluators must supply services that meet a broad array of stated and sometimes unstated needs, many of which are inherently social and political.  In the chapter authored by Hao Tang, M.D., Ph.D. and his colleagues, a strategy to empower local programs to engage in evaluation activities that help fulfill state evaluation requirements and to increase accountability for the effectiveness of local tobacco control interventions is described.

 

The monograph is available from Jossey-Bass at http://www.wiley.com/cda/product/0,,0787963461||2864,00.html.

 

 

 

CONTACT THE EDITOR

d

                 If your state or organization has any news to report for the Tobacco Free Press (TFP), please send to Kristen Tertzakian at ktertzakian@astho.org or fax 202/371-9797 by December 9, 2002 for the next issue.

 

Any questions or concerns about content or policy issues, please contact Kristen Tertzakian, Tobacco Control Senior Policy Analyst at ktertzakian@astho.org.

 

 

© Copyright 2002 ASTHO